Up@dawn 2.0

Saturday, August 31, 2013

Luck of the Draw


In chapter two, Sissela Bok invokes the words of Fredrick Douglas—the African-American social reformer, author, orator, and leader of the Abolishment Movement. Fredrick Douglas, a man born into slavery only to escape, a man who experienced the profound, poignant, and elative moment when he finally found himself beyond the chains of slavery, when asked about his freedom, said the following:

“York, I said I felt as one might be supposed to feel, on escaping from a den of hungry lions. But, in a moment like that, sensations are too intense and too rapid for words.  Anguish and grief, like darkness and rain, may be described, but joy and gladness, like the rainbow of promise, defy alike the pen and pencil” (emphasis mine).   

Do you agree with Douglas that experiential moments of bliss, joy, elation, happiness, et al are beyond description, therefore making happiness difficult to objectively define?

Bok’s quote from Fredrick Douglas skewed my thought in another direction, which drifted beyond the scope of defining happiness.  Douglas’s quote made me reflect the first chapter’s take on luck—stemming from the suggestion that we should be considered lucky to be born, a statement of which I generally concur.   

Although our group discussion focused on the perspective that “we become who we are in part by how we respond to the shifting circumstances which our lives delineate themselves,” I wonder if this perspective would be possible if one’s “luck” was to be born into slavery?  “Shifting circumstances”—or the lack thereof—would be an understatement.  Sure, one could throw on the stoic’s armor of Seneca or Epictetus, but Bok’s previous thought seems to ring hollow in light of great oppression: “It makes no sense, from such a perspective, to settle into the rut of blaming parents, society, or fate for the course one’s life has taken; or to feel locked into some particular mold that nothing can crack open.”  Maybe it’s the metaphorical abandonment of the phrase “locked into some particular mold” that falls short.

Although I’ve all but given up on finding some universally profound quote to save all of humanity, I stumbled across this one from William James: “The greatest use of life is to spend on something that will outlast it.”  Even though Fredrick Douglas escaped his bondage, sadly, that was an isolated case. Today, many are faced with a much more subtle form of social bondage, e.g., unemployment, under-employment, sickness, racism, discrimination, etc., which is often a barrier for many to literally survive—when life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness descends beyond the grasp of humanity. 

I would venture to say that we all have experienced some difficulty in life or know someone who is presently in impossible circumstances—circumstances where there’s a will but not a way.  It’s hard to look on the bright side of life when you’re literally or figuratively tied to the whipping post—or as the expression goes: as luck would have it. 

Friday, August 30, 2013

Robina's Words



She's pretty insightful and I very much enjoyed this video :) (Even though I don't label myself a buddhist, nor do I think that Robina wants all of us to do so)

Luck (Group 2)

Our group primarily focused on the concept of luck, and how we all seem to lose sight of the fact that life itself is a kind of privileged instance of which few maintain an appropriate appreciation. Clearly, it is all too easy to attribute a lack of happiness to "bad luck", overlooking the luck of life itself. This is likely a result of our nature to focus on specific instances of action, as opposed to a comprehensive perspective on our existence. It's common enough to forget how well the big things are going, when all the little things go wrong. While some may see happiness as something to be achieved within life, and others a thing attained simply by survival, we cannot dismiss the significance of having a chance to do either. One would imagine a number of philosophies (those that focus on actually living life, rather than thinking about it), would regard the appreciation of this chance to be at least one of, if not the first, stepping stone in exploring/experiencing happiness in life.

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Luck (ch.1) - Group 1

Today we focused on the topic of happiness being a choice. We started with the quote from Bok, "We become who we are in part by how we respond to the shifting circumstances against which our lives delineate themselves."(p2) We acknowledged that there is a process between initial emotion and the action that follows, which is where the choice is made. Then we explored more instances where the choice is limited because of the need to communicate emotions. We determined that there is a minimum amount of external processing that people need as an outlet and an opportunity to interact with other people.Without letting raw emotions release occasionally it is likely that one day they will all release at once (and no one wants to be around "that guy").  

Luck- group 3

During our brief discussion of Luck, a few quotes were brought up about happiness and the pursuit of such emotion. We quoted Bok by asking "what does it take to acquire happiness?" Does happiness for one equal deceit or another? Is someone else more or less deserving of happiness than I? We referenced our first class example of the bitterly and the net, that we are so busy trying to attain happiness that we end up destroying it in the process. Another concept we liked was the idea that we become who we are by how we respond to the shifting circumstances against which our lives delineate themselves (p2). Like Bok's mother, we can choose to alter the situation given to us by making our own choices.

Pro-choice

& pro-luck.
Happiness is a HAP, subject to happenstance. You have to luck out, to get happy. In the largest sense, since we're here, we all did. It's cliche to say our happiness is a choice, and I don't disagree that in many respects it is. But who really chooses to be born? Our real choices comes later, when trying to decide how we feel about being here. "You can choose what you do, but you can't choose what you LIKE to do," said pop-HAP guru Gretchen Rubin. I'm not sure that's not exactly backwards...
(From "Happy go lucky"...)
==
Today we'll divy ourselves into three groups, and will plan on meeting for group discussion and report planning etc. for a portion of every Thursday. We'll need at least three members of each group to sign on to the blogsite as author-contributors before leaving. Then, one author from each group, please post some sort of summary promptly within an hour or two if possible. If not, one of your group's other authors should step to the plate and do it.  That's so all the non-authors will have a place to post questions, comments, and links. Authors, your post doesn't have to be "perfect"-it just has to be. You can always edit & extend later.

 I'm bringing my scorecards, and will explain my new "ballgame."

HAP 101: our first class was a near-model in civil exchange, despite evidently sharp differences of perspective amongst some of us. There was just the hint of a little dust-up after class, which prompted my light comment here (2d paragraph).  Remember: a good argument isn't just saying "no it isn't," and it's not an ad hominem questioning of others' motives or credentials (or an appeal to the special authority of one's own). Let's all continue to do what almost all of us did last time: play nice, be respectful, disagree agreeably. Have fun. Be happy. Speaking of which, I have Happy news! Carlin Romano's coming to visit our department, on November 8, as the inaugural Fall Lyceum speaker! Watch for details. Now,

Ready for our first Happy Hour, HAP 101? Look for the Dean of HH at Boulevard B&G shortly after class. I'll join you soon as I return my MTBike to the Rec Center.


Saturday, August 24, 2013

Happy to confirm

all our texts are on the shelf in the campus bookstore.
We'll begin with Bok's Exploring Happiness there on the left, and finish with Powers' novel Generosity. But you'll be happiest if you go ahead and start reading Powers now, he raises crucial questions about the wisdom of studying and eventually, possibly engineering happiness in the first place. In the middle are Flanagan's Bodhisattva's Brain and Hecht's Happiness Myth. And I'm counting on everyone in our class, or peering over our shoulders, to help fill out a growing Happiness bibliography we can all continue learning from.

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Get off the couch!

A student writes:
I'm extremely curious to see what is said of happiness from a philosophical standpoint, and perhaps getting some non-chemical tips for getting rid of such a bad case of the perpetual grumpies.
 And here's a jokey reply that nonetheless actually embodies the greatest wisdom I have to share on this topic.


Almost always works for me.

Monday, August 12, 2013

Introductions


Happiness impends! Here's our first assignment, for those looking to get a leg up (or just bored with August).
On the first day we'll do our introductions and begin addressing some simple questions: 
Who are you? Why are you here? 
That's an invitation to make our acquaintance and share some straightforward biographical info. But it's also philosophically inviting and potentially problematic, in our discipline's best tradition.
And then,
Are you [have you ever been, do you hope ever to be] happy?
(Bear in mind, this site is not filtered or segregated from the rest of the web... so, students, be as circumspect as you think you must. There's no reason to worry that Grandma or the Big Bad Wolf are lurking, but you never know.)

Sunday, August 11, 2013

‘MTSU On the Record’ delves into philosophy of happiness

Host Gina Logue’s interview with Dr. Phil Oliver, an MTSU philosophy professor, is scheduled to air from 5:30 to 6 p.m. Monday, Aug. 5, and from 8 to 8:30 a.m. Sunday, Aug. 11, on WMOT-FM (89.5 and www.wmot.org).

Oliver teaches a course titled “The Philosophy of Happiness,” which will concentrate during the fall 2013 semester on the connection between happiness and the meaning of life.

Students will discuss whether it is necessary to live a life of higher ethical purpose to be happy or whether physical pursuits and creature comforts are sufficient, as well as other issues.

To listen to previous programs, go to the “Audio Clips” archives at www.mtsunews.com.

For more information about “MTSU On the Record,” contact Logue at 615-898-5081 or WMOT-FM at 615-898-2800.

MURFREESBORO — The next edition of the “MTSU On the Record” radio program focuses on how we define and pursue happiness.
FOR RELEASE: July 31, 2013
EDITORIAL CONTACT: Gina Logue, 615-898-5081, gina.logue@mtsu.edu

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

The right kind of happy

Pig-wallowing "hedonic" happiness is not as good for you as meaningful "eudaimonic" happiness. 

I've stopped (as of today) tagging those as Benthamite and Millian, respectively. But the point stands: there's more to human happiness than high quantity/low quality hedonic pleasure. Or so says a new study led by UNC psychologist Barbara Frederickson.
To assess eudaimonic well being they asked questions like, “In the past week how often did you feel that your life had a sense of direction or meaning to it?” and “How often did you feel that you had something to contribute to society?...
In volunteers who scored strongly for hedonic well-being and weakly for eudaimonic well-being inflammation-causing genes were 20% more active than average, and genes associated with the production of virus-attacking antibodies 20% less active. In contrast, in those who were the other way round, genes associated with the production of interferons (proteins that support communication during immune-system responses) were 10% more active and antibody genes 30% more active. Eudaimonic pleasure thus looks as though it is good for the health, while hedonic pleasure is bad...
Psychosomatic medicine: The right kind of happy | The Economist

Monday, August 5, 2013

‘MTSU On the Record’ delves into philosophy of happiness

Host Gina Logue’s interview with Dr. Phil Oliver, an MTSU philosophy professor, is scheduled to air from 5:30 to 6 p.m. Monday, Aug. 5, and from 8 to 8:30 a.m. Sunday, Aug. 11, on WMOT-FM (89.5 and www.wmot.org).

Oliver teaches a course titled “The Philosophy of Happiness,” which will concentrate during the fall 2013 semester on the connection between happiness and the meaning of life.

Students will discuss whether it is necessary to live a life of higher ethical purpose to be happy or whether physical pursuits and creature comforts are sufficient, as well as other issues.

To listen to previous programs, go to the “Audio Clips” archives at www.mtsunews.com.

For more information about “MTSU On the Record,” contact Logue at 615-898-5081 or WMOT-FM at 615-898-2800.

MURFREESBORO — The next edition of the “MTSU On the Record” radio program focuses on how we define and pursue happiness.
FOR RELEASE: July 31, 2013
EDITORIAL CONTACT: Gina Logue, 615-898-5081, gina.logue@mtsu.edu

Thursday, August 1, 2013

In praise of pessimism

An optimist can't be a meliorist? Well, some of us meliorists still harbor optimistic tendencies.

"But really, the sweet-smelling grass is beneath our hoofs right now: what is required is that we take pleasure in what is available to us... Unfortunately, in our gastro-fixated culture, the epicurean is associated with fancy concoctions of wheatgrass, rather than the stuff growing close to hand. We need to redress this balance and understand that once the basic necessities of life are accounted for, all the rest can be creative and even wilful.
The optimist can never embrace this perspective, driven as she is by an inchoate need that can always be shaped by others so as to tantalise her. The optimist – again, paradoxically – lives in fear of a future that she endeavours, futilely, to control. The optimists can never be that most desirable of things: a meliorist, because every setback is necessarily a disaster. For the pessimist, it’s simply a matter of shit happens, but until it does, make hay..."
Will Self, In praise of pessimism